|
Post by TCHOF on Nov 24, 2019 11:59:15 GMT -5
Have you actually watched the guy play? He can’t be blocked one on one by good programs (Wisconsin, Penn State) and routinely destroys double-teams. He is an absolute game wrecker. Are you suggesting that we should pass on this guy if he is there for us? What I am saying is Buyer beware. Historically the history of the draft is suggesting so. Have you seen the guy play? (Third time I’ve asked you)
|
|
|
Post by TEM on Nov 24, 2019 11:59:39 GMT -5
You point out notching, If you had a point you would use facts. All my points were valid. They really arent though. Saying Young wont be that good because he has talent around him is kinda ridiculous if you watched him play. I am not saying that, What i am saying history of the 1st round is suggesting that.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on Nov 24, 2019 12:01:21 GMT -5
What I am saying is Buyer beware. Historically the history of the draft is suggesting so. Have you seen the guy play? (Third time I’ve asked you) Not just him the rest of the Defense . They are dam good.. Why I ask are his number inflated because of the players around him.
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Nov 24, 2019 12:08:04 GMT -5
They really arent though. Saying Young wont be that good because he has talent around him is kinda ridiculous if you watched him play. I am not saying that, What i am saying history of the 1st round is suggesting that. Ok So history tells us that any great college player from great teams dont pan out. Gotcha
|
|
|
Post by TEM on Nov 24, 2019 12:38:39 GMT -5
I am not saying that, What i am saying history of the 1st round is suggesting that. Ok So history tells us that any great college player from great teams dont pan out. Gotcha No the history shows a 53% success rate among 1st round picks. 70% of those picks come from 30 schools. What does that say? Are you saying the date is wrong?
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Nov 24, 2019 12:58:21 GMT -5
Ok So history tells us that any great college player from great teams dont pan out. Gotcha No the history shows a 53% success rate among 1st round picks. 70% of those picks come from 30 schools. What does that say? Are you saying the date is wrong? So of the 16.96 players that come out in the first round that are successful (extremely subjective, what is the definition of successful?), 11.872 are from the same 30 schools. First off, thats a lot of schools. The top 30 schools in all sports I bet are a pipeline to success in the next level. So without a comparison it means nothing really. How does this mean Chase Young wont be good again?
|
|
|
Post by TEM on Nov 24, 2019 13:11:32 GMT -5
No the history shows a 53% success rate among 1st round picks. 70% of those picks come from 30 schools. What does that say? Are you saying the date is wrong? So of the 16.96 players that come out in the first round that are successful (extremely subjective, what is the definition of successful?), 11.872 are from the same 30 schools. First off, thats a lot of schools. The top 30 schools in all sports I bet are a pipeline to success in the next level. So without a comparison it means nothing really. How does this mean Chase Young wont be good again? I have showed this 10 times read it for yourself theriotreport.com/scout-camp-2018-about-the-author/
|
|