|
Post by Blue Hulk on Apr 5, 2021 12:02:39 GMT -5
For me.....
Zach Wilson will be a bust....Mac Jones too... Zach Wilson makes questionable reads and he didn't even face a lot of pressure. I don't trust any QB that has all day in the pocket like Zach and Mac.
He is a chuck and duck type of player..
Mac Jones is average and benefited from playing at Bama.
Kwity Paye. Just doing the math, Michigan players on the DL seem to under perform as pros. see Taco Sauce Charlton.
|
|
|
Post by giantlegacy on Apr 5, 2021 12:03:35 GMT -5
Paye Rousseau Mac Jones
|
|
rbe40
Special Teams
Posts: 800
|
Post by rbe40 on Apr 5, 2021 15:10:49 GMT -5
Fields
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Apr 5, 2021 16:17:39 GMT -5
Who ever the Jets take.
|
|
3days
Starter
Posts: 4,006
Member is Online
|
Post by 3days on Apr 5, 2021 16:30:25 GMT -5
I would put Parsons on the top of the list. A) potential off-field issues, B) Seems more potential than actual performance.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on Apr 5, 2021 16:44:53 GMT -5
Pick any quarterback. It’s the most difficult position to translate to the pros. Normally, these kids go to terrible teams. And they will have to learn on the fly as the franchise is rebuilding. Imagine, climbing Mount Everest without any training.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuyRich on Apr 5, 2021 17:25:59 GMT -5
Just because he's an Ohio St. QB.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuyRich on Apr 5, 2021 17:28:06 GMT -5
LOL , Great answer. I love it.
|
|
|
Post by JoeyCush on Apr 5, 2021 17:53:01 GMT -5
I'd want to say Wilson if he is the Jets pick because of their track history with QBs. Maybe this coaching staff is different but their resume speaks for itself.
They completely butchered the Sam Darnold experiment, like real bad.
|
|
|
Post by bavarobeast on Apr 5, 2021 19:35:35 GMT -5
Wow - interesting and some off target assumptions IMHO.
Parsons and Wade are my busts Paye and Fields are my maybe busts Wilson will be good. Mac Jones will be a star - mark that down.
|
|
|
Post by piddy283 on Apr 5, 2021 21:56:26 GMT -5
Rousseau and Sewell. I plan on watching more of both, but I haven't liked much from Rousseau, and I wasn't overly impressed with Sewell. I thought he looked a bit soft.
|
|
|
Post by Blue Hulk on Apr 6, 2021 13:46:13 GMT -5
Wow - interesting and some off target assumptions IMHO. Parsons and Wade are my busts Paye and Fields are my maybe busts Wilson will be good. Mac Jones will be a star - mark that down.** Marked
|
|
|
Post by Kase1 on Apr 6, 2021 13:51:01 GMT -5
Paye Rousseau Fields Wilson Lance
|
|
|
Post by Nite on Apr 6, 2021 14:28:35 GMT -5
Wilson Fields That 2nd division guy Book (Just to piss off Notre Dame fans here ) - Actually I think he will make an excellent 2nd day pick Any prospect that the talking heads love
|
|
te88
Special Teams
Posts: 1,960
|
Post by te88 on Apr 6, 2021 17:51:25 GMT -5
Zach Wilson easily.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on Apr 6, 2021 18:22:13 GMT -5
Lets put some math to this.
Top 10 picks 25year sample 1986-2010
All pro rates per position drafted.
OL 21.6%
CB 17.4%
RB 17.2%
WR 11.8%
TE 11%
DL 10.9%
LB 10.7%
QB 3.0%
S 0.0%
Bust rates
RB 55.2%
DL 40%
WR 38%
TE 37%
QB 36.4%
LB 28.6%
OL 27%
CB 21.7%
S 18.2%
The best bang for you pick is O-Line.
|
|
|
Post by Blue Hulk on Apr 6, 2021 23:48:46 GMT -5
Interesting stats
|
|
|
Post by Fletch842 on Apr 7, 2021 7:18:55 GMT -5
I think as a player, Wilson has the potential to be really good. Unfortunately for him, he will most likely go to the Jets, damning his career.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2021 8:22:04 GMT -5
Lets put some math to this. Top 10 picks 25year sample 1986-2010 All pro rates per position drafted. OL 21.6% CB 17.4% RB 17.2% WR 11.8% TE 11% DL 10.9% LB 10.7% QB 3.0% S 0.0% Bust rates RB 55.2% DL 40% WR 38% TE 37% QB 36.4% LB 28.6% OL 27% CB 21.7% S 18.2% The best bang for you pick is O-Line. Thanks TEM...informative stuff
|
|
|
Post by giantlegacy on Apr 7, 2021 8:30:28 GMT -5
Lets put some math to this. Top 10 picks 25year sample 1986-2010 All pro rates per position drafted. OL 21.6% CB 17.4% RB 17.2% WR 11.8% TE 11% DL 10.9% LB 10.7% QB 3.0% S 0.0% Bust rates RB 55.2% DL 40% WR 38% TE 37% QB 36.4% LB 28.6% OL 27% CB 21.7% S 18.2% The best bang for you pick is O-Line. Thanks TEM...informative stuff So Slater/Sewell or AVT it is
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Apr 10, 2021 8:19:20 GMT -5
Lets put some math to this. Top 10 picks 25year sample 1986-2010 All pro rates per position drafted. OL 21.6% CB 17.4% RB 17.2% WR 11.8% TE 11% DL 10.9% LB 10.7% QB 3.0% S 0.0% Bust rates RB 55.2% DL 40% WR 38% TE 37% QB 36.4% LB 28.6% OL 27% CB 21.7% S 18.2% The best bang for you pick is O-Line. So safety had no all pros but the lowest bust rate? And, Sean Taylor was an All Pro no? If not, he was robbed. CB looks like a good bet off of these numbers too, unless we draft them
|
|
|
Post by TEM on Apr 10, 2021 8:21:31 GMT -5
Thanks TEM...informative stuff So Slater/Sewell or AVT it is I also like Christian Darrisaw with 11
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Apr 29, 2021 19:36:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Analyst on May 9, 2023 7:08:10 GMT -5
Like shooting fish in a barrel.
|
|
|
Post by shocknaweny on May 18, 2023 15:56:42 GMT -5
Wow - interesting and some off target assumptions IMHO. Parsons and Wade are my busts Paye and Fields are my maybe busts Wilson will be good. Mac Jones will be a star - mark that down.Oh my
|
|
|
Post by Blue Hulk on May 20, 2023 20:14:47 GMT -5
Wow - interesting and some off target assumptions IMHO. Parsons and Wade are my busts Paye and Fields are my maybe busts Wilson will be good. Mac Jones will be a star - mark that down.
|
|