|
|
Post by piddy283 on Apr 28, 2021 13:19:52 GMT -5
.....and so it begins.
Could this impact the GMen?
It might mean one less QB drafted in the top-10. It might mean the Broncos will be more willing to trade out now that they don't need QB.
If they stick at #9, what positions does Denver need?
I'm excited.
|
|
|
|
Post by McCherry on Apr 28, 2021 13:28:40 GMT -5
If the Eagles want to jump in front of us they just found their potential trade partner.
|
|
|
|
Post by jintslifer1 on Apr 28, 2021 13:29:20 GMT -5
Teddy is not a long term answer there. Which I do believe in Theodore. But he keeps getting the shaft
Go JINTS. I hope this allows a small trade back and more draft capital
|
|
|
|
Post by jb456 on Apr 28, 2021 13:30:04 GMT -5
I just saw the parameters of the trade:
Denver will pay Bridgewater $3M in 2021 while the Pathers will pay $7M. The Broncos are giving the Pathers a 6th round pick. This is backup QB level compensation or a hedge against the QB they pick not being ready.
|
|
|
|
Post by giantlegacy on Apr 28, 2021 13:32:47 GMT -5
I have a hard time thinking they are giving up on Lock when he really didn't look that bad
|
|
|
|
Post by SG88 on Apr 28, 2021 13:34:23 GMT -5
.....and so it begins. Could this impact the GMen? It might mean one less QB drafted in the top-10. It might mean the Broncos will be more willing to trade out now that they don't need QB. If they stick at #9, what positions does Denver need? I'm excited. Denver is in the same boat as us in that they need a whole lot. I feel like Micah Parsons is their guy but feel like QB is still a strong possibility. Especially if they take one that is 2 years away like Lance. Bridgewater is what his name says, which is a bridge to their long term QB. Lock ain't it. |
|
|
|
Post by SG88 on Apr 28, 2021 13:35:50 GMT -5
I have a hard time thinking they are giving up on Lock when he really didn't look that bad You never know. I am friends with a hard core Broncos fan and he thinks that Lock is not the answer, which is a sentiment from most of their fanbase from what he said. |
|
|
|
Post by jb456 on Apr 28, 2021 13:37:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by jb456 on Apr 28, 2021 13:40:17 GMT -5
I have a hard time thinking they are giving up on Lock when he really didn't look that bad I didn't think so either until I looked at his numbers. 57% completion percentage with 16tds and 15 interceptions, under 3k yards. I know numbers aren't everything and what I saw didn't seem as bad as the numbers but damn, those are some solid stats.....in the early 80's..... |
|
|
|
Post by giantlegacy on Apr 28, 2021 13:40:59 GMT -5
OK that is indeed terrible Especially with an OC (Shurmur)that preaches accuracy |
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Apr 28, 2021 13:41:10 GMT -5
I have a hard time thinking they are giving up on Lock when he really didn't look that bad Maybe Bridgewater is a hedge against Lock not improving? I can't say I have watched enough of the Broncos to have an opinion on Lock. |
|
|
|
Post by Kase1 on Apr 28, 2021 13:43:41 GMT -5
.....and so it begins. Could this impact the GMen? It might mean one less QB drafted in the top-10. It might mean the Broncos will be more willing to trade out now that they don't need QB. If they stick at #9, what positions does Denver need? I'm excited. After looking at their depth chart they seem to need the most help at DL, ILB and CB..... MAYBE QB, depending how they feel about Lock |
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Apr 28, 2021 13:51:39 GMT -5
.....and so it begins. Could this impact the GMen? It might mean one less QB drafted in the top-10. It might mean the Broncos will be more willing to trade out now that they don't need QB. If they stick at #9, what positions does Denver need? I'm excited. After looking at their depth chart they seem to need the most help at DL, ILB and CB..... MAYBE QB, depending how they feel about Lock I mostly see Parsons, QB, Paye, Phillips, Surtain and Horn being projected to them. So it seems people are seeing the same you are. |
|
|
|
Post by bluebuddha on Apr 28, 2021 14:04:35 GMT -5
That's after drafting Jerry Jeudy in the first. It doesn't help Sutton was injured but still. |
|
|
|
Post by Kase1 on Apr 28, 2021 14:07:09 GMT -5
After looking at their depth chart they seem to need the most help at DL, ILB and CB..... MAYBE QB, depending how they feel about Lock I mostly see Parsons, QB, Paye, Phillips, Surtain and Horn being projected to them. So it seems people are seeing the same you are. They have Bradley Chubb and Vonn Miller, an edge rusher like Phillips in the 1st doesnt make sense for them. Paye would actually be a great fit for them, Horn and Surtain as well |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2021 14:08:02 GMT -5
That's a solid trade for them..
|
|
|
|
Post by giantlegacy on Apr 28, 2021 14:09:56 GMT -5
I mostly see Parsons, QB, Paye, Phillips, Surtain and Horn being projected to them. So it seems people are seeing the same you are. They have Bradley Chubb and Vonn Miller, an edge rusher like Phillips in the 1st doesnt make sense for them. Paye would actually be a great fit for them, Horn and Surtain as well Paye od Parsons would be perfect for them |
|
|
|
Post by piddy283 on Apr 28, 2021 14:12:01 GMT -5
I mostly see Parsons, QB, Paye, Phillips, Surtain and Horn being projected to them. So it seems people are seeing the same you are. They have Bradley Chubb and Vonn Miller, an edge rusher like Phillips in the 1st doesnt make sense for them. Paye would actually be a great fit for them, Horn and Surtain as well Was about to post that I'd love to see them draft a Paye or Ojulari. It'd be a Christmas miracle if the Edge players were unexpectedly drafted in the top-10. |
|
|
|
Post by GameTime on Apr 28, 2021 14:55:48 GMT -5
Lock's 3rd season coming up...
TB is a good back and insurance plan.
|
|
|
|
Post by Morehead State on Apr 28, 2021 16:25:04 GMT -5
I have a hard time thinking they are giving up on Lock when he really didn't look that bad Maybe Bridgewater is a hedge against Lock not improving? I can't say I have watched enough of the Broncos to have an opinion on Lock. I think Teddy was brought in to replace Lock. Teddy is a solid QB who can make they plays an NFL QB needs to make. He won't be the reason they lose games. They have some good playmakers.
I think this is a good move by Denver. I think Bridgewater is a good QB.
|
|
|
|
Post by TEM on Apr 28, 2021 16:38:45 GMT -5
They have Bradley Chubb and Vonn Miller, an edge rusher like Phillips in the 1st doesnt make sense for them. Paye would actually be a great fit for them, Horn and Surtain as well Paye od Parsons would be perfect for them I am predicting Philly move up and take Denver's pick. Get Waddle |
|
|
|
Post by giantlegacy on Apr 28, 2021 16:40:10 GMT -5
Maybe Bridgewater is a hedge against Lock not improving? I can't say I have watched enough of the Broncos to have an opinion on Lock. I think Teddy was brought in to replace Lock. Teddy is a solid QB who can make they plays an NFL QB needs to make. He won't be the reason they lose games. They have some good playmakers.
I think this is a good move by Denver. I think Bridgewater is a good QB.
Shurmer had Teddy in Minnesota |
|
|
|
Post by Morehead State on Apr 28, 2021 16:42:13 GMT -5
Paye od Parsons would be perfect for them I am predicting Philly move up and take Denver's pick. Get Waddle I can't predict the future but the Eagles were already at 6 and traded back to 12. It just doesn't make sense to me. |
|
|
|
Post by TEM on Apr 28, 2021 16:47:21 GMT -5
I am predicting Philly move up and take Denver's pick. Get Waddle I can't predict the future but the Eagles were already at 6 and traded back to 12. It just doesn't make sense to me. Here is my logic . There are rumors that Philly wants to jump the Giants to take Waddle . No way Dallas is going to give them even a lick of the number 10 pick. With what Denver did to solidify their QB position makes them a candidate to move down. Philly has 11 draft picks. 3 of them third round picks. They have the Draft capital to move. |
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuyRich on Apr 28, 2021 16:53:52 GMT -5
Teddy is just a bridge till they find another QB next year i would think. imo it'an improvement from Locke. He won't turn the ball over as much that's for sure. As a Giant fan I can relate how frustrating it is having your QB cost you games with turnovers.
Denver has a real good defense and they do have weapons on offense. Denver could go anywhere from here. Trade back, defense, OL, This is a positive for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuyRich on Apr 28, 2021 16:59:38 GMT -5
.....and so it begins. Could this impact the GMen? It might mean one less QB drafted in the top-10. It might mean the Broncos will be more willing to trade out now that they don't need QB. If they stick at #9, what positions does Denver need? I'm excited. After looking at their depth chart they seem to need the most help at DL, ILB and CB..... MAYBE QB, depending how they feel about Lock You know if Denver stays put at #9 and takes CB, Patrick Surtain, this would be a monster pick for them. They have 2 DE's in Von Miller and Chubb. They already were a top defense and in that division with Mahomes, Herbert, and Carr a top CB prospect looks pretty good to me. |
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuyRich on Apr 28, 2021 17:01:21 GMT -5
I can't predict the future but the Eagles were already at 6 and traded back to 12. It just doesn't make sense to me. Here is my logic . There are rumors that Philly wants to jump the Giants to take Waddle . No way Dallas is going to give them even a lick of the number 10 pick. With what Denver did to solidify their QB position makes them a candidate to move down. Philly has 11 draft picks. 3 of them third round picks. They have the Draft capital to move. This would make sense for Philly. Damn it ! |
|
|
|
Post by piddy283 on Apr 28, 2021 17:02:14 GMT -5
I can't predict the future but the Eagles were already at 6 and traded back to 12. It just doesn't make sense to me. Here is my logic . There are rumors that Philly wants to jump the Giants to take Waddle . No way Dallas is going to give them even a lick of the number 10 pick. With what Denver did to solidify their QB position makes them a candidate to move down. Philly has 11 draft picks. 3 of them third round picks. They have the Draft capital to move. Eagles up to Broncos makes sense. Well, not really because it'd be a dumb move for the Eagles, but that's good news for us. Let's say they do trade up for Waddle. For one, I don't think the Bengals and Dolphins both go for one of the Big4, so Smith could still be available. Even if they do, we'd have a plethora of top notch talent to choose from at #11. 1- Lawerence 2- Wilson 3- QB(?) 4- Pitts 5- Sewell (maybe Chase?) 6- Chase (maybe Smith?) 7- No clue...Parsons? 8- Slater 9- Waddle (Eagles) 10- Surtain/Horn 11- Smith/Parsons/Surtain/Horn/Paye/Collins/AVT/??? This move would be in line with many moves the Eagles have made recently. Let's hope it happens. |
|
|
|
Post by Morehead State on Apr 28, 2021 21:00:41 GMT -5
I can't predict the future but the Eagles were already at 6 and traded back to 12. It just doesn't make sense to me. Here is my logic . There are rumors that Philly wants to jump the Giants to take Waddle . No way Dallas is going to give them even a lick of the number 10 pick. With what Denver did to solidify their QB position makes them a candidate to move down. Philly has 11 draft picks. 3 of them third round picks. They have the Draft capital to move. But my point is that they were already ahead of us. If they wanted to stay ahead of teams who would want Waddle...why did they trade down? |
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Apr 29, 2021 7:30:38 GMT -5
Maybe Bridgewater is a hedge against Lock not improving? I can't say I have watched enough of the Broncos to have an opinion on Lock. I think Teddy was brought in to replace Lock. Teddy is a solid QB who can make they plays an NFL QB needs to make. He won't be the reason they lose games. They have some good playmakers.
I think this is a good move by Denver. I think Bridgewater is a good QB.
I will never figure out how you grade QBs if Bridgewater rates as a good QB to you but Eli was garbage. Either way, I disagree.....good is not how I would describe Bridgewater. Adequate would be a better descriptor. |
|
