|
Post by TheAnalyst on Mar 26, 2021 12:10:31 GMT -5
Blockbuster trade!
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Mar 26, 2021 12:11:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Mar 26, 2021 12:12:02 GMT -5
Wonder who they are targeting?
|
|
|
Post by Rangers13 on Mar 26, 2021 12:15:17 GMT -5
Hello Dave Gettleman - that’s how you maximize draft Capital. Wow, what a trade!!!!!
Dolphins are loaded with picks.
|
|
|
Post by Rangers13 on Mar 26, 2021 12:16:01 GMT -5
Wonder who they are targeting? Doubt it’s a HB.
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Mar 26, 2021 12:22:26 GMT -5
Hello Dave Gettleman - that’s how you maximize draft Capital. Wow, what a trade!!!!! Dolphins are loaded with picks. Thats what we should have done in 2018 no doubt.
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Mar 26, 2021 12:52:10 GMT -5
Wow. Dolphins back to 6, Eagles to 12.
|
|
|
Post by Miked1958 on Mar 26, 2021 13:28:34 GMT -5
Wonder who they are targeting? Id say more then likely SF moves up for a QB If so that drops another prime player the giants way that wouldn't of otherwise been there Miami & Philly were both probably going WR/TE meaning Pitts/Chase or Smith Now philly behind us and probably wont get any of those 3 Im thinking Atlanta and Miami still do that. Good chance one of them 3 or parsons/O lineman now could drop to 11 Is it possible others may try and trade in?
|
|
|
Post by Miked1958 on Mar 26, 2021 13:32:56 GMT -5
Wow. Dolphins back to 6, Eagles to 12. Dolphins will still get their man to help Tua at 6 But Philly wont get one to help Hurts at 12. We pick right in front of them so can swipe away say a Pitts or Chase if there Dallas right in front of us almost assuredly goes defense maybe take Parsons right in front of us But anyway you look at it if SF came in for a QB then 1 player that would not of been there at 11 will be.
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Mar 26, 2021 13:38:51 GMT -5
Wow. Dolphins back to 6, Eagles to 12. Dolphins will still get their man to help Tua at 6 But Philly wont get one to help Hurts at 12. We pick right in front of them so can swipe away say a Pitts or Chase if there Dallas right in front of us almost assuredly goes defense maybe take Parsons right in front of us But anyway you look at it if SF came in for a QB then 1 player that would not of been there at 11 will be. Could be #1 - Jags - Lawrence #2 - Jets - Wilson #3 - 49ers - Lance #4 - Falcons - Fields Wouldn't that be something...
|
|
|
Post by Miked1958 on Mar 26, 2021 13:39:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Miked1958 on Mar 26, 2021 13:40:38 GMT -5
Dolphins will still get their man to help Tua at 6 But Philly wont get one to help Hurts at 12. We pick right in front of them so can swipe away say a Pitts or Chase if there Dallas right in front of us almost assuredly goes defense maybe take Parsons right in front of us But anyway you look at it if SF came in for a QB then 1 player that would not of been there at 11 will be. Could be #1 - Jags - Lawrence #2 - Jets - Wilson #3 - 49ers - Lance #4 - Falcons - Fields Wouldn't that be something... Yes look at the updated mock i just posted. This one has QBs 1-4 as you suggested and Pitts going to NY. You called it!!
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Mar 26, 2021 13:45:00 GMT -5
Could be #1 - Jags - Lawrence #2 - Jets - Wilson #3 - 49ers - Lance #4 - Falcons - Fields Wouldn't that be something... Yes look at the updated mock i just posted. This one has QBs 1-4 as you suggested and Pitts going to NY. You called it!! As much as it feels that way, it never happens. One of those teams will go OT or WR IMO.
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Mar 26, 2021 14:11:57 GMT -5
How to rebuild while still being competitive.
|
|
|
Post by Sarcasman on Mar 26, 2021 14:46:44 GMT -5
Can't be right. No way Garappollo isn't the championship deliverin' franchise carryin' greatest signing of Lynch's career. Remember how awful that team wasn't until they signed the great Garap and he carried the team on his back while delivering their fans to immediate relevance and near automatic consecutive Lombardis? That's what I've read on the internet so...fact.
|
|
|
Post by Sarcasman on Mar 26, 2021 14:48:04 GMT -5
Hello Dave Gettleman - that’s how you maximize draft Capital. Wow, what a trade!!!!! Dolphins are loaded with picks. Thats what we should have done in 2018 no doubt. If the was a viable option, no doubt.
|
|
|
Post by Sarcasman on Mar 26, 2021 14:50:43 GMT -5
How to rebuild while still being competitive. When we say this, we are absolutely 100% arbitrarily cherry picking when the relevance clock starts. I agree it's pertinent today and a fantastic example of how to do it now, but it really wasn't for the previous decade.
|
|
|
Post by Rangers13 on Mar 26, 2021 14:54:09 GMT -5
Hello Dave Gettleman - that’s how you maximize draft Capital. Wow, what a trade!!!!! Dolphins are loaded with picks. LOL, stop! If DG did that people would want him to hang! Only those who were obsessed with Barkley . . . and all disappeared overnight.
|
|
|
Post by Fletch842 on Mar 26, 2021 14:54:55 GMT -5
I'll be thrilled if we grab Pitts at 11. I think I've settled in on Chase, Pitts, Smith, Waddle as my order for the "big 4". I also like Slater, PS II, and although the character questions are a bit scary, Parsons. I've read good things about Vera-Tucker as well, but haven't really watch him, so with withhold judgement. If we take anyone else, I'll be pretty annoyed.
|
|
|
Post by Rangers13 on Mar 26, 2021 14:57:16 GMT -5
Thats what we should have done in 2018 no doubt. LOL, another hindsight GM. more like foresight before that draft
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Mar 26, 2021 15:07:13 GMT -5
LOL, another hindsight GM. more like foresight before that draft I wanted Baker. When he was taken #1, I wanted the trade back I was hearing from the Broncos. Hndsight need not apply.
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Mar 26, 2021 15:10:08 GMT -5
Thats what we should have done in 2018 no doubt. If the was a viable option, no doubt. Trading back was a viable option. According to many sources, including DG himself.
|
|
|
Post by Rangers13 on Mar 26, 2021 15:14:45 GMT -5
more like foresight before that draft I wanted Baker. When he was taken #1, I wanted the trade back I was hearing from the Broncos. Hndsight need not apply. many felt the same way. I was for Darnold or trade out like many. Some still have a case of Kim Jones and were so obsessed with Barkley they literally can’t recall what else was spoken,posted, etc . . . or they can’t help themselves and love to stir the pot.
|
|
|
Post by Sarcasman on Mar 26, 2021 15:15:05 GMT -5
more like foresight before that draft I wanted Baker. When he was taken #1, I wanted the trade back I was hearing from the Broncos. Hndsight need not apply. Fair point. Mirage is probably a better word for foresight that sees things that aren't actually there.
|
|
|
Post by Sarcasman on Mar 26, 2021 15:16:01 GMT -5
If the was a viable option, no doubt. Trading back was a viable option. According to many sources, including DG himself. Sure, it's just that no one can validate it at all. I get it: the new world = alternative facts.
|
|
|
Post by Rangers13 on Mar 26, 2021 15:16:24 GMT -5
If the was a viable option, no doubt. Trading back was a viable option. According to many sources, including DG himself. lol, the phone was actually ringing with Gettleman claiming there was no reason to answer it lol. Any Giants fan knows this.
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Mar 26, 2021 15:17:07 GMT -5
I wanted Baker. When he was taken #1, I wanted the trade back I was hearing from the Broncos. Hndsight need not apply. Fair point. Mirage is probably a better word for foresight that sees things that aren't actually there. Help me understand, so when the tree falls in the forest and you aren't there to hear it, it never happened?
|
|
|
Post by TheAnalyst on Mar 26, 2021 15:18:43 GMT -5
Trading back was a viable option. According to many sources, including DG himself. Sure, it's just that no one can validate it at all. I get it: the new world = alternative facts. No one can validate what?
|
|
|
Post by Sarcasman on Mar 26, 2021 15:20:35 GMT -5
Fair point. Mirage is probably a better word for foresight that sees things that aren't actually there. Help me understand, so when the tree falls in the forest and you aren't there to hear it, it never happened? Of course it happened. We can walk into the forest and examine clear and unequivocal evidence of that.
|
|
|
Post by Sarcasman on Mar 26, 2021 15:21:32 GMT -5
Great. What was the offer he turned down?
|
|