|
Post by DonnieYen on Jun 13, 2018 19:16:58 GMT -5
Cody Latimer I believe could be a big steal of a signing he seems to be Eli's go to receiver in camp as well as Engram. what do you guys think can Latimer and Engram be big for us this year?
|
|
|
Post by Jomo on Jun 13, 2018 21:07:18 GMT -5
I am going to go out on a limb and say that even if Cody Latimer is Eli's go to receiver thus far in mini camp, he will largely be a non factor when real bullets start to fly.
|
|
|
Post by giants38 on Jun 13, 2018 22:22:35 GMT -5
Ellison will catch more passes than Latimer.
|
|
|
Post by TheAussieGiant on Jun 14, 2018 1:34:43 GMT -5
If Latimer catches 3 or more TDs comes away from the year with 20ish catches then I think that'd be a very big year for the kid.
|
|
|
Post by jimmieray on Jun 14, 2018 6:01:09 GMT -5
I am going to go out on a limb and say that even if Cody Latimer is Eli's go to receiver thus far in mini camp, he will largely be a non factor when real bullets start to fly. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that if Manning is given time and the scheme I think they have in mind, you will see somewhat equal production from every receiving option he has out there.
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Jun 14, 2018 8:18:52 GMT -5
I am going to go out on a limb and say that even if Cody Latimer is Eli's go to receiver thus far in mini camp, he will largely be a non factor when real bullets start to fly. I think I found that limb you are out on src="
|
|
|
Post by Blue Hulk on Jun 14, 2018 10:02:10 GMT -5
Cody Latimer and Sterling Shepard can have big seasons if defenses are keying in on Dell, Engram, & Saquon
|
|
|
Post by Fletch842 on Jun 14, 2018 11:59:01 GMT -5
I am going to go out on a limb and say that even if Cody Latimer is Eli's go to receiver thus far in mini camp, he will largely be a non factor when real bullets start to fly. So long as Odell is on the field, I agree completely. If not, for whatever reason, he could pick up some of the slack, something sorely missing last season.
|
|
|
Post by Jomo on Jun 14, 2018 20:12:58 GMT -5
I am going to go out on a limb and say that even if Cody Latimer is Eli's go to receiver thus far in mini camp, he will largely be a non factor when real bullets start to fly. I think I found that limb you are out on src=" Good
|
|
|
Post by Jomo on Jun 14, 2018 20:13:52 GMT -5
I think I found that limb you are out on src=" Good Strong limb right there JM,
|
|
|
Post by Roosevelt on Jun 14, 2018 20:59:32 GMT -5
Knobby.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 6:13:21 GMT -5
Who comes out on top at the 2nd outside receiver?
|
|
|
Post by TEM on Jun 15, 2018 6:13:57 GMT -5
There is a reason Denver did not throw the ball to Latimer and let him walk . Would you guys want Barden or Hixon back on the team when they were allowed to walk . He is the same player. There is a reason these kind of recievers are not re-signed or cut.
IMO: He is a lower version of Rueben Randle. He was a better receiver and the Giants let him walk. I agree with Jomo. He will be coverage ploy when the season starts .
|
|
|
Post by Nick6475 on Jun 15, 2018 10:20:50 GMT -5
If Latimer has a good year then all of our other WRs got hurt again.
|
|
|
Post by believernyg10 on Jun 15, 2018 10:30:34 GMT -5
There is a reason Denver did not throw the ball to Latimer and let him walk . Would you guys want Barden or Hixon back on the team when they were allowed to walk . He is the same player. There is a reason these kind of recievers are not re-signed or cut. IMO: He is a lower version of Rueben Randle. He was a better receiver and the Giants let him walk. I agree with Jomo. He will be coverage ploy when the season starts . Latimer is the 2nd best WR on the roster. And wayyyyy better than Randle.
|
|
|
Post by believernyg10 on Jun 15, 2018 10:31:11 GMT -5
If Latimer has a good year then all of our other WRs got hurt again. Latimer is the 2nd best WR on the roster.
|
|
|
Post by believernyg10 on Jun 15, 2018 10:31:34 GMT -5
I am going to go out on a limb and say that even if Cody Latimer is Eli's go to receiver thus far in mini camp, he will largely be a non factor when real bullets start to fly. He's the 2nd best WR on the Giants.
|
|
|
Post by Nick6475 on Jun 15, 2018 10:40:50 GMT -5
If Latimer has a good year then all of our other WRs got hurt again. Latimer is the 2nd best WR on the roster. Is that you Cody?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 11:02:30 GMT -5
If anyone believes that Latimer is the 2nd best WR on this team then they literally have no prior experience with him until they read the headline that the Giants signed him.
I, like Nick above, live in the DEN market. This kid has been a bust since he was drafted.
If he turns out to be anything more than a good STs player then we got a lot of production out of him.
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Jun 15, 2018 11:06:45 GMT -5
I am going to go out on a limb and say that even if Cody Latimer is Eli's go to receiver thus far in mini camp, he will largely be a non factor when real bullets start to fly. He's the 2nd best WR on the Giants. Now, I like the Cody signing, but what evidence leads you to that conclusion. OBJ, SS and EE have all accomplished more already in their careers catching the football and I'd be willing to bet if they lined Barkley up at WR that he would be an improvement over Cody at WR. I expect to see SS, OBJ, EE, SB and RE all out there together most of the time because you can run most offensive sets with the skills of that personnel. So it is doubtful he is in the starting 11 if everyone is healthy.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on Jun 15, 2018 19:42:19 GMT -5
There is a reason Denver did not throw the ball to Latimer and let him walk . Would you guys want Barden or Hixon back on the team when they were allowed to walk . He is the same player. There is a reason these kind of recievers are not re-signed or cut. IMO: He is a lower version of Rueben Randle. He was a better receiver and the Giants let him walk. I agree with Jomo. He will be coverage ploy when the season starts . Latimer is the 2nd best WR on the roster. And wayyyyy better than Randle. According to what and who? He has 35 career receptions. Those stats alone at best make him second from the bottom. The only thing this guy has proved he can catch is a cold, Randle had more catches in his second year alone. From now on if you are going to comment on my posts. Use some intellect.
|
|
|
Post by NAVY2323(ret) on Jun 15, 2018 20:03:06 GMT -5
Latimer is the 2nd best WR on the roster. And wayyyyy better than Randle. According to what and who? He has 35 career receptions. Those stats alone at best make him second from the bottom. The only thing this guy has proved he can catch is a cold, Randle had more catches in his second year alone. Form now on if you are going to comment on my posts. Use some intellect. Latimer might not even be on the final 53. He's not better than Randle and he sure as hell isn't better than Shepard. Some people post from a place of absurdity and simply enjoy luring us in like moths to the flame. No thanks.
|
|
|
Post by TheAussieGiant on Jun 17, 2018 20:42:36 GMT -5
There is a reason Denver did not throw the ball to Latimer and let him walk . Would you guys want Barden or Hixon back on the team when they were allowed to walk . He is the same player. There is a reason these kind of recievers are not re-signed or cut. IMO: He is a lower version of Rueben Randle. He was a better receiver and the Giants let him walk. I agree with Jomo. He will be coverage ploy when the season starts . Randle struggled to beat 1 on 1 coverage. He never really improved the whole time he was here. That guy never looked like he had the drive or desire to be a winner. I think the NFL was just a paycheck to him
|
|
|
Post by TEM on Jun 18, 2018 8:01:55 GMT -5
There is a reason Denver did not throw the ball to Latimer and let him walk . Would you guys want Barden or Hixon back on the team when they were allowed to walk . He is the same player. There is a reason these kind of recievers are not re-signed or cut. IMO: He is a lower version of Rueben Randle. He was a better receiver and the Giants let him walk. I agree with Jomo. He will be coverage ploy when the season starts . Randle struggled to beat 1 on 1 coverage. He never really improved the whole time he was here. That guy never looked like he had the drive or desire to be a winner. I think the NFL was just a paycheck to him I agree , but the Giants trusted him with the ball. Denver apparently did not. There is a reason for that.
|
|
|
Post by jb456 on Jun 19, 2018 16:46:13 GMT -5
There is a reason Denver did not throw the ball to Latimer and let him walk . Would you guys want Barden or Hixon back on the team when they were allowed to walk . He is the same player. There is a reason these kind of recievers are not re-signed or cut. IMO: He is a lower version of Rueben Randle. He was a better receiver and the Giants let him walk. I agree with Jomo. He will be coverage ploy when the season starts . Latimer is the 2nd best WR on the roster. And wayyyyy better than Randle. I don't like using stats as an end all and be all of an argument but doesn't Latimer have a total 35 receptions and 445 years in his 4 year career? You think he is better than Shepard? I mean, his total career stats would be an average year for a TE, right? What exactly am I missing here?
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Jun 19, 2018 17:55:04 GMT -5
Latimer is the 2nd best WR on the roster. And wayyyyy better than Randle. I don't like using stats as an end all and be all of an argument but doesn't Latimer have a total 35 receptions and 445 years in his 4 year career? You think he is better than Shepard? I mean, his total career stats would be an average year for a TE, right? What exactly am I missing here? A complete detachment from reality.
|
|
|
Post by believernyg10 on Jun 19, 2018 18:36:07 GMT -5
Latimer is the 2nd best WR on the roster. And wayyyyy better than Randle. I don't like using stats as an end all and be all of an argument but doesn't Latimer have a total 35 receptions and 445 years in his 4 year career? You think he is better than Shepard? I mean, his total career stats would be an average year for a TE, right? What exactly am I missing here? Shepard's stats are manufactured. Latimer is the more explosive playmaker.
|
|
|
Post by jb456 on Jun 19, 2018 20:17:15 GMT -5
I don't like using stats as an end all and be all of an argument but doesn't Latimer have a total 35 receptions and 445 years in his 4 year career? You think he is better than Shepard? I mean, his total career stats would be an average year for a TE, right? What exactly am I missing here? A complete detachment from reality. LMAO, I see.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on Jun 20, 2018 10:24:38 GMT -5
I don't like using stats as an end all and be all of an argument but doesn't Latimer have a total 35 receptions and 445 years in his 4 year career? You think he is better than Shepard? I mean, his total career stats would be an average year for a TE, right? What exactly am I missing here? Shepard's stats are manufactured. Latimer is the more explosive playmaker. Last off season it was John Jerry . This year it is Latimer . Who will it be next year ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2018 11:34:05 GMT -5
Shepard's stats are manufactured. Latimer is the more explosive playmaker.
|
|