|
Post by Morehead State on Oct 16, 2019 8:50:44 GMT -5
How about you answer the questions you were asked. Neither of them were difficult. They were to me.
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Oct 16, 2019 9:54:14 GMT -5
How about you answer the questions you were asked. Neither of them were difficult. They were to me. Yes here they are again in case you missed them. Really cannot comprehend what is so difficult about answering simple questions.
|
|
|
Post by Morehead State on Oct 16, 2019 10:11:55 GMT -5
Yes here they are again in case you missed them. Really cannot comprehend what is so difficult about answering simple questions. You really need to learn to play along better. I say this now to save yourself embarrassment in the future.
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Oct 16, 2019 10:51:33 GMT -5
Yes here they are again in case you missed them. Really cannot comprehend what is so difficult about answering simple questions. You really need to learn to play along better. I say this now to save yourself embarrassment in the future. I am very confused as to why you are unwilling to answer these questions. But forget it, I don't really care. I was just curious.
|
|
|
Post by Morehead State on Oct 16, 2019 11:37:48 GMT -5
You really need to learn to play along better. I say this now to save yourself embarrassment in the future. I am very confused as to why you are unwilling to answer these questions. But forget it, I don't really care. I was just curious. 1. No...I have never dealt with Trump directly......It was a joke. 2. I was not referring directly to the post I responded to. I was responding to your generally combative trend on the MB as a whole.
Does this satisfy your need for answers? Did you really think I knew the President of the United States personally...and had interactions with him?.....Really?
|
|
|
Post by Delicreep on Oct 16, 2019 11:41:42 GMT -5
I am very confused as to why you are unwilling to answer these questions. But forget it, I don't really care. I was just curious. 1. No...I have never dealt with Trump directly......It was a joke. 2. I was not referring directly to the post I responded to. I was responding to your generally combative trend on the MB as a whole.
Does this satisfy your need for answers? Did you really think I knew the President of the United States personally...and had interactions with him?.....Really?
You are a Mod here - I thought you might be important enough to have Trump ask to meet you.
|
|
|
Post by Morehead State on Oct 16, 2019 11:44:14 GMT -5
1. No...I have never dealt with Trump directly......It was a joke. 2. I was not referring directly to the post I responded to. I was responding to your generally combative trend on the MB as a whole.
Does this satisfy your need for answers? Did you really think I knew the President of the United States personally...and had interactions with him?.....Really?
You are a Mod here - I thought you might be important enough to have Trump ask to meet you. My sphere of influence only goes up to cabinet positions.
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Oct 16, 2019 11:45:50 GMT -5
I am very confused as to why you are unwilling to answer these questions. But forget it, I don't really care. I was just curious. 1. No...I have never dealt with Trump directly......It was a joke. 2. I was not referring directly to the post I responded to. I was responding to your generally combative trend on the MB as a whole.
Does this satisfy your need for answers? Did you really think I knew the President of the United States personally...and had interactions with him?.....Really?
Yes. I had no clue one way or the other. Trump has done business with many people over the years, why couldn't you be one of them? IDK, I was curious, sorry. It isn't like he only spawned on this earth to run in the last election. I've had interactions with him, why would I think for a moment that you couldn't possibly have?
|
|
|
Post by Morehead State on Oct 16, 2019 11:54:33 GMT -5
1. No...I have never dealt with Trump directly......It was a joke. 2. I was not referring directly to the post I responded to. I was responding to your generally combative trend on the MB as a whole.
Does this satisfy your need for answers? Did you really think I knew the President of the United States personally...and had interactions with him?.....Really?
Yes. I had no clue one way or the other. Trump has done business with many people over the years, why couldn't you be one of them? IDK, I was curious, sorry. It isn't like he only spawned on this earth to run in the last election. I've had interactions with him, why would I think for a moment that you couldn't possibly have? One of these days I'll figure you out. But I fear that day is far in the future.
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Oct 16, 2019 12:02:35 GMT -5
Yes. I had no clue one way or the other. Trump has done business with many people over the years, why couldn't you be one of them? IDK, I was curious, sorry. It isn't like he only spawned on this earth to run in the last election. I've had interactions with him, why would I think for a moment that you couldn't possibly have? One of these days I'll figure you out. But I fear that day is far in the future. Not sure what is so hard to figure out. I am a fairly direct person.
|
|
|
Post by Delicreep on Oct 16, 2019 12:05:15 GMT -5
You are a Mod here - I thought you might be important enough to have Trump ask to meet you. My sphere of influence only goes up to cabinet positions. And now we know!
|
|
|
Post by Morehead State on Oct 16, 2019 14:43:15 GMT -5
One of these days I'll figure you out. But I fear that day is far in the future. Not sure what is so hard to figure out. I am a fairly direct person. No. You're a very literal person.
You seem to struggle with untold, yet clear meanings to certain communications.
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Oct 16, 2019 15:13:59 GMT -5
Not sure what is so hard to figure out. I am a fairly direct person. No. You're a very literal person.
You seem to struggle with untold, yet clear meanings to certain communications.
How can something be clear if untold? How can something be clear if misinterpreted? If you wish to be clear, be clear. Use words that mean what you want to say. Much of casual communication is dependent on tone and body language. This is a medium that lacks both. Here there is only words. So if one is not precise in their use, one cannot be clear. You made a statement that you had trouble with Trump listening to you. There was nothing to indicate you weren't telling the truth and there was nothing in the statement that made it clearly impossible. It piqued my curiosity, so I asked. This did not need to be a several page back and forth, you could have just answered the question. Though, since you clearly believe I am a literal person; why would you think I was doing anything but asking a question in the first place?
|
|
|
Post by Morehead State on Oct 16, 2019 15:18:05 GMT -5
No. You're a very literal person.
You seem to struggle with untold, yet clear meanings to certain communications.
How can something be clear if untold? How can something be clear if misinterpreted? If you wish to be clear, be clear. Use words that mean what you want to say. Much of casual communication is dependent on tone and body language. This is a medium that lacks both. Here there is only words. So if one is not precise in their use, one cannot be clear. You made a statement that you had trouble with Trump listening to you. There was nothing to indicate you weren't telling the truth and there was nothing in the statement that made it clearly impossible. It piqued my curiosity, so I asked. This did not need to be a several page back and forth, you could have just answered the question. Though, since you clearly believe I am a literal person; why would you think I was doing anything but asking a question in the first place? My way is more fun.
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Oct 16, 2019 15:23:35 GMT -5
How can something be clear if untold? How can something be clear if misinterpreted? If you wish to be clear, be clear. Use words that mean what you want to say. Much of casual communication is dependent on tone and body language. This is a medium that lacks both. Here there is only words. So if one is not precise in their use, one cannot be clear. You made a statement that you had trouble with Trump listening to you. There was nothing to indicate you weren't telling the truth and there was nothing in the statement that made it clearly impossible. It piqued my curiosity, so I asked. This did not need to be a several page back and forth, you could have just answered the question. Though, since you clearly believe I am a literal person; why would you think I was doing anything but asking a question in the first place? My way is more fun. Then it is not I who is the combative one my friend.
|
|
|
Post by Morehead State on Oct 16, 2019 15:27:04 GMT -5
Then it is not I who is the combative one my friend. That comment is above my pay grade. You don't find it more enjoyable to speak with nuance and ambiguity at times?
|
|
|
Post by jmike on Oct 16, 2019 15:38:37 GMT -5
Then it is not I who is the combative one my friend. That comment is above my pay grade. You don't find it more enjoyable to speak with nuance and ambiguity at times?
No, mostly I find it frustrating. As I said, I am a direct person in a world of people who are nothing of the sort. I find communicating with people who disagree with me to be enjoyable as I find it is the best way to learn. The "agree to disagree" mantra is the stupidest waste of time to follow. Nobody learns, nobody thinks, nothing gets accomplished. I have some very strongly held opinions that align with my personal principles. Those opinions and principles need to be regularly challenged to be sure that they are the right ones to follow. One can hold opinions that do not align with their principles and often won't notice without a challenge to them. One may discover that the right thing does not align with one's principles, which will force the need to reevaluate those principles. These are the types of discussions that I enjoy. Most people are unwilling to engage because they are frightened of a challenge that may reveal to themselves that their opinions are not consistent with what they believe their principles to be.
|
|
|
Post by Miked1958 on Oct 16, 2019 15:56:06 GMT -5
Well he missed some easy throws that shoukd of been TDs, took sacks he didnt have to where he coukd of thrown ball away. Not saying the deep throw to i think Tate was easy. But he was all by himself. The one in back of endzone to Tate. Again all be himself. You want to beat the champs you have to make those throws Now Tate didnt help him later getting hit between the numbers in endzone and dropping it IMO making some mistakes is not the same as the stage being too big for him. Was the stage too big for Brady? He threw a bad pick and fumbled a ball that was run back for a TD. To me that’s one of the most encouraging things about this kid - the stage isn’t too big for him. Well then I agree with you. Maybe I used the wrong choice of words. Once this kid gets more games under his belt and more experience he will be making those throws and make less mistakes Hey, afterall Peyton Manning threw 27 INTs in his rookie season
|
|