|
Post by IrishMike on Aug 13, 2021 14:40:41 GMT -5
Maybe you should rewatch those games and pay a little attention to his OLs pass blocking and especially to his WRs and TE. If he was simply as bad as you say then no preseason games would matter because he should have been cut and that Ohio State kid should be our QB not playing in Chicago. Why would I rewatch them? I’m not a fan of watching a homicide take place. Oh, the classic it’s everyone else’s fault routine. That never gets old, let’s just blame the line, the receivers, the sun while you’re at it. He was part of that disaster, not a victim of circumstances. And he was that bad, hence why the Giants whole offseason was to help him. Emphasize the word “help.” It's funny watching you spin things. It was all his fault, not the OL or the WRs. The whole offseason was the "help him". It wasn't to improve the team. Like I said if Jones was as bad as you make it seem they would have replaced him, yet there was not ever even a hint they might replace him.
Yes he was PART of the disaster. Key word their is part. If he was as bad as you say then playing one series this week would not make a difference.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on Aug 13, 2021 14:46:31 GMT -5
Why would I rewatch them? I’m not a fan of watching a homicide take place. Oh, the classic it’s everyone else’s fault routine. That never gets old, let’s just blame the line, the receivers, the sun while you’re at it. He was part of that disaster, not a victim of circumstances. And he was that bad, hence why the Giants whole offseason was to help him. Emphasize the word “help.” It's funny watching you spin things. It was all his fault, not the OL or the WRs. The whole offseason was the "help him". It wasn't to improve the team. Like I said if Jones was as bad as you make it seem they would have replaced him, yet there was not ever even a hint they might replace him.
Yes he was PART of the disaster. Key word their is part. If he was as bad as you say then playing one series this week would not make a difference.
I don’t spin nothing, try keeping up with me. And you wouldn’t feel dizzy. The Giants don’t work that way, replace their 6th overall pick after just two years? You and I both know that’s not how they do business. For all intents and purposes, this is his make or break season for him. No more he doesn’t have weapons, second year in the same offense. Even you wouldn’t be able to defend another bad year from him. Well, you might try. Won’t succeed though..
|
|
|
Post by IrishMike on Aug 13, 2021 15:29:36 GMT -5
I don’t spin nothing, try keeping up with me. And you wouldn’t feel dizzy. The Giants don’t work that way, replace their 6th overall pick after just two years? You and I both know that’s not how they do business. For all intents and purposes, this is his make or break season for him. No more he doesn’t have weapons, second year in the same offense. Even you wouldn’t be able to defend another bad year from him. Well, you might try. Won’t succeed though.. He isn't playing this week...and I still won't have to defend anything. You however will have to find some new crazy way to blame everything on him and DG and Judge and Mara and somehow give each of them 100% of the blame.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on Aug 13, 2021 15:34:03 GMT -5
I don’t spin nothing, try keeping up with me. And you wouldn’t feel dizzy. The Giants don’t work that way, replace their 6th overall pick after just two years? You and I both know that’s not how they do business. For all intents and purposes, this is his make or break season for him. No more he doesn’t have weapons, second year in the same offense. Even you wouldn’t be able to defend another bad year from him. Well, you might try. Won’t succeed though.. He isn't playing this week...and I still won't have to defend anything. You however will have to find some new crazy way to blame everything on him and DG and Judge and Mara and somehow give each of them 100% of the blame. Yeah, because all those men are forever blameless. And who are you kidding? You would defend Jones at a murder trial with all evidence pointed at him.
|
|
|
Post by GameTime on Aug 13, 2021 15:39:48 GMT -5
It's funny watching you spin things. It was all his fault, not the OL or the WRs. The whole offseason was the "help him". It wasn't to improve the team. Like I said if Jones was as bad as you make it seem they would have replaced him, yet there was not ever even a hint they might replace him.
Yes he was PART of the disaster. Key word their is part. If he was as bad as you say then playing one series this week would not make a difference.
I don’t spin nothing, try keeping up with me. And you wouldn’t feel dizzy. The Giants don’t work that way, replace their 6th overall pick after just two years? You and I both know that’s not how they do business. For all intents and purposes, this is his make or break season for him. No more he doesn’t have weapons, second year in the same offense. Even you wouldn’t be able to defend another bad year from him. Well, you might try. Won’t succeed though.. most 3rd year QBs who are supposed to be the future have make or break 3rd years. Jones is no different. The team they are trying to build around him has to be done regardless of who the QB is. Hopefully he is the guy. If he's not they move on.
|
|
|
Post by vinnie on Aug 13, 2021 15:54:43 GMT -5
Do you agree that some play time is better than nothing? Of course I think they would get better playing 100% of the snaps compared to 50%, just as I think playing one or two quarters is better than playing none. When you have a new and young group of players that played on the worse offense in the league last year then I think its highly irresponsible and just dumb to not give them a decent amount of reps for at least a quarter or two every game. My way isn’t a guarantee of success but it increases the chances, especially with this group. Again, if these were a bunch of seasoned vets who played together last year and did a good job then I would understand but it’s not, it’s the complete opposite. And yes, I’m slightly more concerned with the O line getting more reps than Jones but not by much and they need to work together. If the O line is still bad then Jones needs to get used to understanding how much time he has to throw and work on his pocket awareness. The O line needs to get used to audibles, his snap count, etc. Jones and the O line go hand in hand. Yes of course some play time is better than nothing. So we both agree playing all the snaps is a bad plan and playing some snaps is a good plan. I do not think he needs to play some snaps in each game though. If they are going to be on a snap count during the preseason then I can see a definite benefit to getting more work in during a single game. In game adjustments, fatigue ect.
If Judge was telling us Jones is not going to play any snaps this preseason I would be puzzled for sure. A QB not playing snaps in a single game is nothing new at all. Sure it's a bit different to not play them the first game instead of the last game but maybe just maybe he has a method to his madness. Our last two coaches played these guys plenty in the first game and that never worked out. I'm not opposed to trying something new is all.
He is not the only one either. The Chargers aren't playing Herbert at all this preseason, some other teams are sitting their starter this week and playing them in other games (according Ryan Dunleavy).
I just think playing some in each game is more beneficial for a younger group. It gives them a chance to face different opponents with different skill sets and defenses plus it helps identify weaknesses sooner than later so they have more time to correct them. I think the last two coaches failures overall in relation to letting starters play plenty in the first game had more to do with lack of talent than lack of playing time. With Judge’s method it may be a result of both. Herbert had an amazing rookie year, I understand why they place more of an emphasis on protecting him rather than giving him more playing time. Jones threw 11 TD’s, 10 INT’s and still had glaring flaws last season.
|
|
|
Post by vinnie on Aug 13, 2021 16:06:06 GMT -5
Looks like Judge is doing it the opposite way - the starters get increasing reps in the preseason games rather than decreasing. So the reps that he would ordinarily get in preseason game 1, he will get in preseason game 3. Is this the right way to do it? I don’t know … but I do like that Judge thinks on his own and doesn’t just do things because “that’s the way it’s always been done.” If he was planning to play only the backup OL and WR’s, it doesn’t make sense to have Jones in there. exactly.....and Jones and the starters were not going to play in all three games so why does it matter which games they play in? From Jones' perspective he probably cant wait to get out there. He's probably chomping at the bit. Why? Because all of last year all I heard was how young they were, how they got better as the season went along and how they just needed more time to gel. So suddenly that doesn’t apply in pre season? They still sucked hind teet at the end of the season and this unit still hasn’t played together at all so do I get to hear the same excuses this year when the regular season starts and they suck again? They better be firing on all cylinders against the Broncos or these pre season games will come up.
|
|
|
Post by GameTime on Aug 13, 2021 16:07:47 GMT -5
exactly.....and Jones and the starters were not going to play in all three games so why does it matter which games they play in? From Jones' perspective he probably cant wait to get out there. He's probably chomping at the bit. Why? Because Judge has made a preseason plan and this is how he is coordinating when which players play.
|
|
|
Post by IrishMike on Aug 13, 2021 16:35:02 GMT -5
He isn't playing this week...and I still won't have to defend anything. You however will have to find some new crazy way to blame everything on him and DG and Judge and Mara and somehow give each of them 100% of the blame. Yeah, because all those men are forever blameless. And who are you kidding? You would defend Jones at a murder trial with all evidence pointed at him. Who said blameless? There goes more of your spin. I say Jones sucks when he sucks, I just don't overreact because he isn't playing in the first preseason game and pretending like THAT is what will make him great or not. His overall success or failure we can blame/credit .00005% on this preseason game.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on Aug 13, 2021 16:40:45 GMT -5
Yeah, because all those men are forever blameless. And who are you kidding? You would defend Jones at a murder trial with all evidence pointed at him. Who said blameless? There goes more of your spin. I say Jones sucks when he sucks, I just don't overreact because he isn't playing in the first preseason game and pretending like THAT is what will make him great or not. His overall success or failure we can blame/credit .00005% on this preseason game. You never say he sucks. That’s a boldfaced lie.. You find a silver lining in everything with him. That’s why you’re his number one groupie, I mean fan. As for blameless, you said I would just blame Mara, Gettleman and Jones. For which, the three have been instrumental in our losing over the past two years. It’s not spinning when it’s written in plain English.
|
|
|
Post by IrishMike on Aug 13, 2021 16:42:58 GMT -5
I just think playing some in each game is more beneficial for a younger group. It gives them a chance to face different opponents with different skill sets and defenses plus it helps identify weaknesses sooner than later so they have more time to correct them. I think the last two coaches failures overall in relation to letting starters play plenty in the first game had more to do with lack of talent than lack of playing time. With Judge’s method it may be a result of both. Herbert had an amazing rookie year, I understand why they place more of an emphasis on protecting him rather than giving him more playing time. Jones threw 11 TD’s, 10 INT’s and still had glaring flaws last season. You keep saying younger group. As far as I know just Jones is not playing, did they say the other starters aren't as well (I might have missed that). I honestly can see the benefit of both ways. Yes if you play a little in each game you can go back, watch your film and make adjustments. Since they are on an overall snap limit though playing more in a single game can have benefits as well like getting to make in game adjustments, playing with fatigue, simulating a real game, limiting possible covid exposure against the filthy Jets ect. If he gets 50 snaps in the preseason in 2 games or 50 snaps in preseason in 3 games I don't see any difference.
Herbert did very well, he isn't the best he can be yet so why not get better faster? He is not Tom Brady or Peyton Manning to skip an entire preseason. He's not the only Charger not playing either, several are being held out. My point is this is not just a Judge thing, many teams across the league are doing it. Seems the younger coaches are trying something different, which I'm all for. As bad as we have been I would think you guys are all for something new and different. Guess not.
|
|
|
Post by IrishMike on Aug 13, 2021 16:45:07 GMT -5
You never say he sucks. That’s a boldfaced lie.. You find a silver lining in everything with him. That’s why you’re his number one groupie, I mean fan. As for blameless, you said I would just blame Mara, Gettleman and Jones. For which, the three have been instrumental in our losing over the past two years. It’s not spinning when it’s written in plain English. Jones sucked last year.
Of course I see positives too. Not every single thing he did was bad. You can't admit that though cause you're blinded by hate He also isn't the only one to blame. Try to keep up, I said you would blame them each 100%, which isn't possible, but you will spin it so it's possible.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on Aug 13, 2021 16:49:03 GMT -5
You never say he sucks. That’s a boldfaced lie.. You find a silver lining in everything with him. That’s why you’re his number one groupie, I mean fan. As for blameless, you said I would just blame Mara, Gettleman and Jones. For which, the three have been instrumental in our losing over the past two years. It’s not spinning when it’s written in plain English. Jones sucked last year.
Of course I see positives too. Not every single thing he did was bad. You can't admit that though cause you're blinded by hate He also isn't the only one to blame. Try to keep up, I said you would blame them each 100%, which isn't possible, but you will spin it so it's possible.
I have no hate. Again, you’ve been wrong this whole conversation. Impressive feat, but a pointless one. I give Jones credit when it’s deserving. I’m slowing down for you, and I still see you in my rear view mirror.
|
|
|
Post by IrishMike on Aug 13, 2021 17:24:10 GMT -5
I have no hate. Again, you’ve been wrong this whole conversation. Impressive feat, but a pointless one. I give Jones credit when it’s deserving. I’m slowing down for you, and I still see you in my rear view mirror. Sure bud, if you say I'm wrong it must be true. How can you see me in your rearview if your head is up your ass? For someone that has never been wrong you sure whine like a (edited) lot. Who cares if you don't agree which game he should sit for, do we really need another hissy fit in August from you? You're getting old better save that hate stamina for the season when we suck again cause Jones sat the first preseason game.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on Aug 13, 2021 17:54:17 GMT -5
I have no hate. Again, you’ve been wrong this whole conversation. Impressive feat, but a pointless one. I give Jones credit when it’s deserving. I’m slowing down for you, and I still see you in my rear view mirror. Sure bud, if you say I'm wrong it must be true. How can you see me in your rearview if your head is up your ass? For someone that has never been wrong you sure whine like a (edited) lot. Who cares if you don't agree which game he should sit for, do we really need another hissy fit in August from you? You're getting old better save that hate stamina for the season when we suck again cause Jones sat the first preseason game.
I’m not saying you’re wrong. I’m telling you. You keep barking about the hate speech, but yet you have no bite. Who says I’m never wrong? I’ve never said that, this is you throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. Like your Daniel Jones winning the MVP. That’s laughable even for you.. You wish my head was up my ass, maybe then I can understand what the hell your point is. Do you even have one?
|
|
|
Post by vinnie on Aug 13, 2021 18:16:44 GMT -5
Because Judge has made a preseason plan and this is how he is coordinating when which players play. All hail Joe Judge!
|
|
|
Post by vinnie on Aug 13, 2021 18:21:34 GMT -5
I just think playing some in each game is more beneficial for a younger group. It gives them a chance to face different opponents with different skill sets and defenses plus it helps identify weaknesses sooner than later so they have more time to correct them. I think the last two coaches failures overall in relation to letting starters play plenty in the first game had more to do with lack of talent than lack of playing time. With Judge’s method it may be a result of both. Herbert had an amazing rookie year, I understand why they place more of an emphasis on protecting him rather than giving him more playing time. Jones threw 11 TD’s, 10 INT’s and still had glaring flaws last season. You keep saying younger group. As far as I know just Jones is not playing, did they say the other starters aren't as well (I might have missed that). I honestly can see the benefit of both ways. Yes if you play a little in each game you can go back, watch your film and make adjustments. Since they are on an overall snap limit though playing more in a single game can have benefits as well like getting to make in game adjustments, playing with fatigue, simulating a real game, limiting possible covid exposure against the filthy Jets ect. If he gets 50 snaps in the preseason in 2 games or 50 snaps in preseason in 3 games I don't see any difference.
Herbert did very well, he isn't the best he can be yet so why not get better faster? He is not Tom Brady or Peyton Manning to skip an entire preseason. He's not the only Charger not playing either, several are being held out. My point is this is not just a Judge thing, many teams across the league are doing it. Seems the younger coaches are trying something different, which I'm all for. As bad as we have been I would think you guys are all for something new and different. Guess not.
How many of those teams had arguably the worst offense AND offensive line last year AND a QB that threw anywhere close to 11 TD to 10 INT’s?
|
|
|
Post by DandyDon on Aug 13, 2021 19:33:32 GMT -5
Jeeze. The hyperventilating over this is silly. People writing book length posts over the first preseason game?
|
|
|
Post by McCherry on Aug 13, 2021 19:48:53 GMT -5
I just think playing some in each game is more beneficial for a younger group. It gives them a chance to face different opponents with different skill sets and defenses plus it helps identify weaknesses sooner than later so they have more time to correct them. I think the last two coaches failures overall in relation to letting starters play plenty in the first game had more to do with lack of talent than lack of playing time. With Judge’s method it may be a result of both. Herbert had an amazing rookie year, I understand why they place more of an emphasis on protecting him rather than giving him more playing time. Jones threw 11 TD’s, 10 INT’s and still had glaring flaws last season. You keep saying younger group. As far as I know just Jones is not playing, did they say the other starters aren't as well (I might have missed that). I honestly can see the benefit of both ways. Yes if you play a little in each game you can go back, watch your film and make adjustments. Since they are on an overall snap limit though playing more in a single game can have benefits as well like getting to make in game adjustments, playing with fatigue, simulating a real game, limiting possible covid exposure against the filthy Jets ect. If he gets 50 snaps in the preseason in 2 games or 50 snaps in preseason in 3 games I don't see any difference.
Herbert did very well, he isn't the best he can be yet so why not get better faster? He is not Tom Brady or Peyton Manning to skip an entire preseason. He's not the only Charger not playing either, several are being held out. My point is this is not just a Judge thing, many teams across the league are doing it. Seems the younger coaches are trying something different, which I'm all for. As bad as we have been I would think you guys are all for something new and different. Guess not.
I think you make a good point here. This has to be a consideration why teams don't want to play their starters around the league. Before covid you saw starters being held out for fear of injury, now add covid to that equation. I'm not sure that the league expected so many unvaccinated players. And coaches can't afford to lose their starters because some players refuse to cooperate. In practice you have the ability to limit contact, you can't control that in preseason games. In the risk vs reward scenario, it's all risk and no reward.
|
|
|
Post by vinnie on Aug 13, 2021 21:03:12 GMT -5
You keep saying younger group. As far as I know just Jones is not playing, did they say the other starters aren't as well (I might have missed that). I honestly can see the benefit of both ways. Yes if you play a little in each game you can go back, watch your film and make adjustments. Since they are on an overall snap limit though playing more in a single game can have benefits as well like getting to make in game adjustments, playing with fatigue, simulating a real game, limiting possible covid exposure against the filthy Jets ect. If he gets 50 snaps in the preseason in 2 games or 50 snaps in preseason in 3 games I don't see any difference.
Herbert did very well, he isn't the best he can be yet so why not get better faster? He is not Tom Brady or Peyton Manning to skip an entire preseason. He's not the only Charger not playing either, several are being held out. My point is this is not just a Judge thing, many teams across the league are doing it. Seems the younger coaches are trying something different, which I'm all for. As bad as we have been I would think you guys are all for something new and different. Guess not.
I think you make a good point here. This has to be a consideration why teams don't want to play their starters around the league. Before covid you saw starters being held out for fear of injury, now add covid to that equation. I'm not sure that the league expected so many unvaccinated players. And coaches can't afford to lose their starters because some players refuse to cooperate. In practice you have the ability to limit contact, you can't control that in preseason games. In the risk vs reward scenario, it's all risk and no reward. I’ve actually seen more starters play in the first game this year than usual. Also, wouldn’t it be more prudent to play your starters in the first pre season game or two, rather than the last, so if they are exposed they can go through the protocol and hopefully be available by the first real game?
|
|
|
Post by GameTime on Aug 14, 2021 5:51:22 GMT -5
Because Judge has made a preseason plan and this is how he is coordinating when which players play. All hail Joe Judge! Hopefully thats the case.
|
|
|
Post by IrishMike on Aug 14, 2021 10:15:47 GMT -5
I’m not saying you’re wrong. I’m telling you. You keep barking about the hate speech, but yet you have no bite. Who says I’m never wrong? I’ve never said that, this is you throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. Like your Daniel Jones winning the MVP. That’s laughable even for you.. You wish my head was up my ass, maybe then I can understand what the hell your point is. Do you even have one? I'd rather make a laughable prediction than sit here and complain about whether Jones is playing in the first preseason game or not. That's the difference, I will make a prediction and potentially be wrong; you just cry about the most mundane things and this way you can't possibly be wrong. Even if Jones is great you would say "he would have done better if he played that first game". Your shtick gets old man.
So do you even have a point?
|
|
|
Post by IrishMike on Aug 14, 2021 10:16:45 GMT -5
How many of those teams had arguably the worst offense AND offensive line last year AND a QB that threw anywhere close to 11 TD to 10 INT’s? No idea. My guess is none of those teams had an MVP QB or won the Super Bowl though so each and every one of them could stand to get better.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on Aug 14, 2021 10:24:18 GMT -5
I’m not saying you’re wrong. I’m telling you. You keep barking about the hate speech, but yet you have no bite. Who says I’m never wrong? I’ve never said that, this is you throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. Like your Daniel Jones winning the MVP. That’s laughable even for you.. You wish my head was up my ass, maybe then I can understand what the hell your point is. Do you even have one? I'd rather make a laughable prediction than sit here and complain about whether Jones is playing in the first preseason game or not. That's the difference, I will make a prediction and potentially be wrong; you just cry about the most mundane things and this way you can't possibly be wrong. Even if Jones is great you would say "he would have done better if he played that first game". Your shtick gets old man.
So do you even have a point?
Still talking Mike? I stopped listening to you posts ago.. And who’s crying? Can’t differentiate constructive criticism to crying? That’s your problem. Again, you’re wrong. What are we at four now? I never take anything away from a players success, in all my years of posting I have yet to do that. You must be confused, again.. Yes, I do have a point. I and the other posters were discussing how Jones needs all the reps he can get. Then, you came in with your Daniel Jones pom poms and got all emotional. You don’t think he needs the snaps, most of us do.
|
|
|
Post by GameTime on Aug 14, 2021 10:54:41 GMT -5
why do some of you think Jones is not going to get enough snaps in preseason?
In a 4 game preseason he's prob get 3 quarters total max.
He will most likely get the same this preseason as well. Why does it matter which games he gets those snaps in??
|
|
|
Post by Jomo on Aug 14, 2021 11:03:27 GMT -5
why do some of you think Jones is not going to get enough snaps in preseason? In a 4 game preseason he's prob get 3 quarters total max. He will most likely get the same this preseason as well. Why does it matter which games he gets those snaps in?? Jones will get the work he needs. I am more interested in keeping him out of harms way while we audition a dozen OL who have no chance of making this roster except for one or maybe two.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2021 11:14:30 GMT -5
I’m not saying you’re wrong. I’m telling you. You keep barking about the hate speech, but yet you have no bite. Who says I’m never wrong? I’ve never said that, this is you throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. Like your Daniel Jones winning the MVP. That’s laughable even for you.. You wish my head was up my ass, maybe then I can understand what the hell your point is. Do you even have one? I'd rather make a laughable prediction than sit here and complain about whether Jones is playing in the first preseason game or not. That's the difference, I will make a prediction and potentially be wrong; you just cry about the most mundane things and this way you can't possibly be wrong. Even if Jones is great you would say "he would have done better if he played that first game". Your shtick gets old man.
So do you even have a point?
One of your great success stories in your life.... is that wrongness Be proud of being... the few that manages this steady stream of wrong
|
|
|
Post by GameTime on Aug 14, 2021 11:18:36 GMT -5
why do some of you think Jones is not going to get enough snaps in preseason? In a 4 game preseason he's prob get 3 quarters total max. He will most likely get the same this preseason as well. Why does it matter which games he gets those snaps in?? Jones will get the work he needs. I am more interested in keeping him out of harms way while we audition a dozen OL who have no chance of making this roster except for one or maybe two. I hear that. Currently there are 13 or 14 OL on the 90 man roster. They will most likely keep 7. Maybe 1 or 2 on the PS as well.
|
|
|
Post by IrishMike on Aug 14, 2021 11:51:09 GMT -5
Still talking Mike? I stopped listening to you posts ago.. And who’s crying? Can’t differentiate constructive criticism to crying? That’s your problem. Again, you’re wrong. What are we at four now? I never take anything away from a players success, in all my years of posting I have yet to do that. You must be confused, again.. Yes, I do have a point. I and the other posters were discussing how Jones needs all the reps he can get. Then, you came in with your Daniel Jones pom poms and got all emotional. You don’t think he needs the snaps, most of us do. Yet here you are still replying. "No shit.. There is only three preseason games this year, with a team that has been a cluster **** for a good part of a decade." "What a stupid question. I would blame you of course"
These are your posts to other members here. It's not constructive criticism. It's you acting like a bad ass and jump down anyone's throat that dares to have a different opinion than you. How about be a ****ing grown ass adult and disagree like one? These comments weren't even made to me, I just get tired of seeing you attack other members cause "ZOMG you don't agree with me".
I didn't say he doesn't need more snaps, no one did. Go read a damn post for once in your life. I, and others, have said there is more than 1 way to get those snaps. Oh no we don't agree with you, neither does half the damn NFL.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on Aug 14, 2021 14:06:40 GMT -5
Still talking Mike? I stopped listening to you posts ago.. And who’s crying? Can’t differentiate constructive criticism to crying? That’s your problem. Again, you’re wrong. What are we at four now? I never take anything away from a players success, in all my years of posting I have yet to do that. You must be confused, again.. Yes, I do have a point. I and the other posters were discussing how Jones needs all the reps he can get. Then, you came in with your Daniel Jones pom poms and got all emotional. You don’t think he needs the snaps, most of us do. Yet here you are still replying. "No shit.. There is only three preseason games this year, with a team that has been a cluster **** for a good part of a decade." "What a stupid question. I would blame you of course"
These are your posts to other members here. It's not constructive criticism. It's you acting like a bad ass and jump down anyone's throat that dares to have a different opinion than you. How about be a ****ing grown ass adult and disagree like one? These comments weren't even made to me, I just get tired of seeing you attack other members cause "ZOMG you don't agree with me".
I didn't say he doesn't need more snaps, no one did. Go read a damn post for once in your life. I, and others, have said there is more than 1 way to get those snaps. Oh no we don't agree with you, neither does half the damn NFL.
Someone didn’t have their apple juice this morning. You don’t know shit, matter of fact. If it was possible, you would know less. It’s you, who gets all bent out of shape when fans don’t agree with you. It’s you, who leaves novels of lame responses when a fan dares gives a different point of view. I actually like when fans have different opinions, it’s how we learn. The post you copied, was sarcasm towards Big Red. And he took it like a man, and had a good response. You would have cried wolf, and resorted to petty child humor. Grow the **** up.. I read all the posts here, especially the drivel you post. You aren’t a glass is half full fan. You’re a give me another glass I spilled my drink again fan. Always, trying to act like your opinions matter more than others. Take a knee and get off your high horse.
|
|