|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 9:01:37 GMT -5
You do not think Barkley knows how to run? That is funnier than your stand last year on canceling the Draft. I have to give that one to you . I did not think you had it in you to top that one . But you did. It is mindboggling that you think his only purpose on 3rd down would be to block. That’s what I said? I was commenting on your stupid horse analogy. You know, leaving your horse in the stable on race day.. Obviously, this has nothing to do with Barkley running. I was speaking on his blocking, which you seem to defend. Barkley has been so bad that he has been substituted on 3rd downs for Gallman. You know, the dime a dozen back you refer him too. If that’s not an indictment on Barkley’s blocking, nothing is. Yeah, what was I thinking with the draft during the height of a pandemic. People are losing lives, jobs, their well being. But, let’s watch the draft.. It was stupid and you know it.. Typical money grubbing NFL at its finest.. Speaking of gems, still want to try and sell me that the Giants should take Daniel Jones biggest strength away from him? Why don’t we ask him to stop breathing too, that should build his stamina.. . Yeah blah blah blah straw-man argument.If you actually read this thread .I said I do not want any of the Giants' weapons blocking. That has been this teams biggest problem. (the root issue) The O-line cannot block well enough to keep us out constantly being in 3rd and long. So if the situation goes the way you want .That is an indication that our offense still can not move the ball. And that my friend is the logic that eludes you. The issue is not wether he can block .The issue is why are always in a situation where the RB needs to?
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on May 25, 2021 9:15:49 GMT -5
That’s what I said? I was commenting on your stupid horse analogy. You know, leaving your horse in the stable on race day.. Obviously, this has nothing to do with Barkley running. I was speaking on his blocking, which you seem to defend. Barkley has been so bad that he has been substituted on 3rd downs for Gallman. You know, the dime a dozen back you refer him too. If that’s not an indictment on Barkley’s blocking, nothing is. Yeah, what was I thinking with the draft during the height of a pandemic. People are losing lives, jobs, their well being. But, let’s watch the draft.. It was stupid and you know it.. Typical money grubbing NFL at its finest.. Speaking of gems, still want to try and sell me that the Giants should take Daniel Jones biggest strength away from him? Why don’t we ask him to stop breathing too, that should build his stamina.. . Yeah blah blah blah straw-man argument.If you actually read this thread .I said I do not want any of the Giants' weapons blocking. That has been this teams biggest problem. (the root issue) The O-line cannot block well enough to keep us out constantly being in 3rd and long. So if the situation goes the way you want .That is an indication that our offense still can not move the ball. And that my friend is the logic that eludes you. The issue is not wether he can block .The issue is why are always in a situation where the RB needs to? Hey pot, meet kettle.. If anyone is making a straw man argument, it’s you. The premise of this thread if you read the op, is Barkley worth a big contract? And then it goes into detail of his blemishes of his game. And the biggest wart is his blocking. This isn’t Penn State, where he can run all day and go out on pass patterns. You have to be able to block in this league, if you can’t. You have to design an offensive game plan to negate that. Good luck Garrett, you have a running back who couldn’t block your mother on his best day.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 9:29:09 GMT -5
. Yeah blah blah blah straw-man argument.If you actually read this thread .I said I do not want any of the Giants' weapons blocking. That has been this teams biggest problem. (the root issue) The O-line cannot block well enough to keep us out constantly being in 3rd and long. So if the situation goes the way you want .That is an indication that our offense still can not move the ball. And that my friend is the logic that eludes you. The issue is not wether he can block .The issue is why are always in a situation where the RB needs to? Hey pot, meet kettle.. If anyone is making a straw man argument, it’s you. The premise of this thread if you read the op, is Barkley worth a big contract? And then it goes into detail of his blemishes of his game. And the biggest wart is his blocking. This isn’t Penn State, where he can run all day and go out on pass patterns. You have to be able to block in this league, if you can’t. You have to design an offensive game plan to negate that. Good luck Garrett, you have a running back who couldn’t block your mother on his best day. Show me one time in this thread I chose to use words that were not spoken by someone else to make my point. Unlike you I don't have to engage in that dialog to make my points.But keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on May 25, 2021 9:33:37 GMT -5
Hey pot, meet kettle.. If anyone is making a straw man argument, it’s you. The premise of this thread if you read the op, is Barkley worth a big contract? And then it goes into detail of his blemishes of his game. And the biggest wart is his blocking. This isn’t Penn State, where he can run all day and go out on pass patterns. You have to be able to block in this league, if you can’t. You have to design an offensive game plan to negate that. Good luck Garrett, you have a running back who couldn’t block your mother on his best day. . Show me one time in this thread I chose to use words that were not spoken by someone else to make my point. Unlike you I don't have to engage in that dialog to make my points.But keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better. One time? I can show you several. You have yet to make a statement without putting words in someone else’s mouth. You’re having enough trouble speaking for yourself, don’t try to speak for others.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 9:38:51 GMT -5
. Show me one time in this thread I chose to use words that were not spoken by someone else to make my point. Unlike you I don't have to engage in that dialog to make my points.But keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better. One time? I can show you several. You have yet to make a statement without putting words in someone else’s mouth. You’re having enough trouble speaking for yourself, don’t try to speak for others. And yet you fail to produce one. Sound like someone is really annoyed and has to spin away from the underlying reason why we are more often than not in 3rd and long. As I said the issue is not if he can block.The issue is why are always in a position where he has to.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on May 25, 2021 9:43:36 GMT -5
One time? I can show you several. You have yet to make a statement without putting words in someone else’s mouth. You’re having enough trouble speaking for yourself, don’t try to speak for others. And yet you fail to produce one. Sound like someone is really annoyed and has to spin away from the underlying reason why we are more often than not in 3rd and long. No, I’m not looking back at this thread and citing your posts. You have fingers and eyes, use them. This is the same thread we argued hypotheticals. Remember? “What if Barkley had two all pro seasons, and ended it with a super bowl.” Would you pay him? Again, you couldn’t be more wrong if you tried. At least, you didn’t use your straw man argument again. You’ve beaten that horse enough over the past few weeks. Give another member a chance to use it.. Edit: This is the NFL, where moving the chains is difficult. If your back can’t do his part, then what good is he?
|
|
|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 9:45:45 GMT -5
And yet you fail to produce one. Sound like someone is really annoyed and has to spin away from the underlying reason why we are more often than not in 3rd and long. No, I’m not looking back at this thread and citing your posts. You have fingers and eyes, use them. This is the same thread we argued hypotheticals. Remember? “What if Barkley had two all pro seasons, and ended it with a super bowl.” Would you pay him? Again, you couldn’t be more wrong if you tried. At least, you didn’t use your straw man argument again. You’ve beaten that horse enough over the past few weeks. Give another member a chance to use it.. Of course you won't because they do not exist.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on May 25, 2021 9:51:33 GMT -5
No, I’m not looking back at this thread and citing your posts. You have fingers and eyes, use them. This is the same thread we argued hypotheticals. Remember? “What if Barkley had two all pro seasons, and ended it with a super bowl.” Would you pay him? Again, you couldn’t be more wrong if you tried. At least, you didn’t use your straw man argument again. You’ve beaten that horse enough over the past few weeks. Give another member a chance to use it.. Of course you won't because they do not exist. Sure.. And your point doesn’t exist too..
|
|
|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 9:51:46 GMT -5
No, I’m not looking back at this thread and citing your posts. You have fingers and eyes, use them. This is the same thread we argued hypotheticals. Remember? “What if Barkley had two all pro seasons, and ended it with a super bowl.” Would you pay him? Again, you couldn’t be more wrong if you tried. At least, you didn’t use your straw man argument again. You’ve beaten that horse enough over the past few weeks. Give another member a chance to use it.. Of course you won't because they do not exist.You should really look up the meaning of sraw-man argument But keep going with using everything but the actual meaning.0to try to make your points valid. It is none the less entertaning.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 9:53:11 GMT -5
Of course you won't because they do not exist. Sure.. And your point doesn’t exist too.. Keep telling yourself that.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on May 25, 2021 9:59:05 GMT -5
Sure.. And your point doesn’t exist too.. Keep telling yourself that. I don’t have too. Your posts are doing the talking for you.. What is your stance? Are you denying Barkley has blocking issues?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2021 10:47:13 GMT -5
Barkley can and should be in on 3rd and short/manageable ...sitting on 3rd and for sure a pass.
I'm also going to go out on a limb here, and suggest Judge eventually gets him blocking well enough he trusts him on 3rd and for sure pass.
|
|
|
Post by jb456 on May 25, 2021 11:17:40 GMT -5
Barkley can and should be in on 3rd and short/manageable ...sitting on 3rd and for sure a pass. I'm also going to go out on a limb here, and suggest Judge eventually gets him blocking well enough he trusts him on 3rd and for sure pass. I just can't believe how bad Barkley is at blocking. Isn't it kind of crazy that we are debating if the Giants running back selected #2 overall should be in on 3rd and long? I just don't see how this guy will get paid unless he becomes at least average in pass blocking. Why wouldn't a defensive Coordinator just send the house on every 3rd and long if Barkley is on the field? Top 5 players aren't supposed to handicap your team and pigeon hole them in regular game situations. 3rd and long happens very often in the NFL....
|
|
|
Post by Martin on May 25, 2021 11:52:38 GMT -5
Barkley can and should be in on 3rd and short/manageable ...sitting on 3rd and for sure a pass. I'm also going to go out on a limb here, and suggest Judge eventually gets him blocking well enough he trusts him on 3rd and for sure pass. I just can't believe how bad Barkley is at blocking. Isn't it kind of crazy that we are debating if the Giants running back selected #2 overall should be in on 3rd and long? I just don't see how this guy will get paid unless he becomes at least average in pass blocking. Why wouldn't a defensive Coordinator just send the house on every 3rd and long if Barkley is on the field? Top 5 players aren't supposed to handicap your team and pigeon hole them in regular game situations. 3rd and long happens very often in the NFL.... It is crazy but it's true. Blocking is a big deal for the RB. If they expose the QB to a sack that sack can lead to a fumble which can lead to a turnover which can lead to points scored. That one missed block can in essence lose a game. Judge better fix this issue much like Coughlin did with Tiki's fumbling problem.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 13:11:44 GMT -5
Keep telling yourself that. I don’t have too. Your posts are doing the talking for you.. What is your stance? Are you denying Barkley has blocking issues? I think I made my stance very clear. If the offence can move the ball on 1st and 2nd down. He won't have to. It has been and will be about the o-line ability to win in the trenches.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on May 25, 2021 14:00:01 GMT -5
I don’t have too. Your posts are doing the talking for you.. What is your stance? Are you denying Barkley has blocking issues? I think I made my stance very clear. If the offence can move the ball on 1st and 2nd down. He won't have to. It has been and will be about the o-line ability to win in the trenches. In a perfect world, that would be great. Have 3rd and short all season long, and never ask Barkley to block. Now, on planet Earth that’s not possible. We will be in plenty of 3rd and longs. Which at times, Barkley would be asked to pick up a blitz. We could go jumbo package, and add an extra lineman. Or, keep a tightend in to block. However, opposing defenses will pick up on this fairly quickly. And attack it accordingly. Face it, Barkley is not good at something. I know most fans don’t want to openly admit that. But, it’s out there for everyone to see.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 14:20:41 GMT -5
I think I made my stance very clear. If the offence can move the ball on 1st and 2nd down. He won't have to. It has been and will be about the o-line ability to win in the trenches. In a perfect world, that would be great. Have 3rd and short all season long, and never ask Barkley to block. Now, on planet Earth that’s not possible. We will be in plenty of 3rd and longs. Which at times, Barkley would be asked to pick up a blitz. We could go jumbo package, and add an extra lineman. Or, keep a tightend in to block. However, opposing defenses will pick up on this fairly quickly. And attack it accordingly. Face it, Barkley is not good at something. I know most fans don’t want to openly admit that. But, it’s out there for everyone to see. If we can score more than 20 points a game . Poof we can't move the ball. We won't be in must pass on every down situation. We are always playing from behind. The best way to stop a blitz is to get the lead by more of then one score. That way we are able to use the entire playbook. Again it is all about the o-line's ability to win in the trenches. You may not agree with it but that is the way it is.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on May 25, 2021 14:25:16 GMT -5
In a perfect world, that would be great. Have 3rd and short all season long, and never ask Barkley to block. Now, on planet Earth that’s not possible. We will be in plenty of 3rd and longs. Which at times, Barkley would be asked to pick up a blitz. We could go jumbo package, and add an extra lineman. Or, keep a tightend in to block. However, opposing defenses will pick up on this fairly quickly. And attack it accordingly. Face it, Barkley is not good at something. I know most fans don’t want to openly admit that. But, it’s out there for everyone to see. If we can score more than 20 points a game . Poof we can't move the ball. We won't be in must pass on every down situation. We are always playing from behind. The best way to stop a blitz is to get the lead by more of then one score. That way we are able to use the entire playbook. Even the best offenses have to deal with playing from behind. This isn’t a video game, we’re playing against the best of the best. I want a balanced attack, last year we passed the ball 113x more than we ran. That’s unacceptable, with the players now we should change those numbers. No matter how well our offense performs, we still need our backs to be capable blockers. That includes Barkley..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2021 14:30:53 GMT -5
If we can score more than 20 points a game . Poof we can't move the ball. We won't be in must pass on every down situation. We are always playing from behind. The best way to stop a blitz is to get the lead by more of then one score. That way we are able to use the entire playbook. Even the best offenses have to deal with playing from behind. This isn’t a video game, we’re playing against the best of the best. I want a balanced attack, last year we passed the ball 113x more than we ran. That’s unacceptable, with the players now we should change those numbers. No matter how well our offense performs, we still need our backs to be capable blockers. That includes Barkley..It's crazy how some fans don't get this.. You tried!
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on May 25, 2021 14:49:33 GMT -5
Even the best offenses have to deal with playing from behind. This isn’t a video game, we’re playing against the best of the best. I want a balanced attack, last year we passed the ball 113x more than we ran. That’s unacceptable, with the players now we should change those numbers. No matter how well our offense performs, we still need our backs to be capable blockers. That includes Barkley..It's crazy how some fans don't get this.. You tried! Fans get it. Denial isn’t just a river in Egypt..
|
|
|
Post by Martin on May 25, 2021 15:02:56 GMT -5
It's crazy how some fans don't get this.. You tried! Fans get it. Denial isn’t just a river in Egypt.. No, it's a lonely street in Boston.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 15:21:14 GMT -5
If we can score more than 20 points a game . Poof we can't move the ball. We won't be in must pass on every down situation. We are always playing from behind. The best way to stop a blitz is to get the lead by more of then one score. That way we are able to use the entire playbook. Even the best offenses have to deal with playing from behind. This isn’t a video game, we’re playing against the best of the best. I want a balanced attack, last year we passed the ball 113x more than we ran. That’s unacceptable, with the players now we should change those numbers. No matter how well our offense performs, we still need our backs to be capable blockers. That includes Barkley.. A) If your o-line can not block you won't score. B) If you are in 3rd and long every other 3rd down because your o-line can't block. You won't score. C)If your best weapons are used to protect the QB every other 3rd down and removed from being given the ball. You are self defeating. D)In the history of the NFL. "We drafted him or gave him a big contract (running back) because he can block" has never been spoken by an HC, GM or Owner. There is I dumbed down to a kindergarten level. By the way who are you putting in there on 3rd down to block ? Apparently it ain't Devontae Booker. You can see the film breakdown in the link I thought I read this when he was signed. But even though was 100% sure I was correct . I wanted to confirm it. I did not have time to at work to find the confirmation I should he just posted it . "Pass Protection: The Raiders used several running backs in their third-down role: starter Josh Jacobs, Jalen Richard, Booker himself, and Theo Riddick. Richard was better in pass protection, as was Riddick, and Jacobs is more dynamic than Booker. However, Booker was a solid receiving option who was physical in space and could make a man miss here and there. As a pass protector, though, he was hit or miss(See film clip in link) Here against the Jets, Booker locates a blitzing defensive back by crossing in front of Derek Carr and shoving the defender out of the pocket. A solid play by Booker against a defender who had a lot of momentum coming forward. Booker’s pass protection ability isn’t maximized because of his anchor, stagnant play strength, and positioning. (His guy sacks Carr) (See film clip in link) It’s a similar blitz pick-up from the one above, and Booker’s strength is exposed. Booker takes a bit to recognize where the extra man is coming from, but he does end up in a solid position to execute the block. He attempts to throw him inside shoulder into the defensive back, but it hardly affects the defender. It’s not the easiest block in the world, but it’s one you’d expect a third-down type of running back to make. ( literally pushed out of the way) (See film clip in link) Booker gets bullied by a linebacker here as the running back adjusts to the twist; his strength and anchor are an issue again. He locates the Blitzer in the A-gap but just gets pushed backward despite winning the pad-level battle. There are worse pass protectors than Booker, but he’s not exactly someone to write home about either. (ILB push him right back into Carr) linkBut you already know RBs do not get signed because they can pass protect. It is because they can run and catch the ball. In Devontae's case ability to also play special teams.
|
|
|
Post by imgrate on May 25, 2021 15:43:22 GMT -5
Even the best offenses have to deal with playing from behind. This isn’t a video game, we’re playing against the best of the best. I want a balanced attack, last year we passed the ball 113x more than we ran. That’s unacceptable, with the players now we should change those numbers. No matter how well our offense performs, we still need our backs to be capable blockers. That includes Barkley.. A) If your o-line can not block you won't score. B) If you are in 3rd and long every other 3rd down because your o-line can't block. You won't score. C)If your best weapons are used to protect the QB every other 3rd down and removed from being given the ball. You are self defeating. D)In the history of the NFL. "We drafted him or gave him a big contract (running back) because he can block" has never been spoken by an HC, GM or Owner. There is I dumbed down to a kindergarten level. On a somewhat similar note. If you dedicate too much cap space to a RB, then you're ability to build a good enough OL is reduced.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 16:04:19 GMT -5
A) If your o-line can not block you won't score. B) If you are in 3rd and long every other 3rd down because your o-line can't block. You won't score. C)If your best weapons are used to protect the QB every other 3rd down and removed from being given the ball. You are self defeating. D)In the history of the NFL. "We drafted him or gave him a big contract (running back) because he can block" has never been spoken by an HC, GM or Owner. There is I dumbed down to a kindergarten level. On a somewhat similar note. If you dedicate too much cap space to a RB, then you're ability to build a good enough OL is reduced. That is a fact. Because we have very manageable dead cap ( well below league average). We can afford to be over league averages ( and we are) on both RBs and o-line.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on May 25, 2021 16:32:16 GMT -5
Even the best offenses have to deal with playing from behind. This isn’t a video game, we’re playing against the best of the best. I want a balanced attack, last year we passed the ball 113x more than we ran. That’s unacceptable, with the players now we should change those numbers. No matter how well our offense performs, we still need our backs to be capable blockers. That includes Barkley.. A) If your o-line can not block you won't score. B) If you are in 3rd and long every other 3rd down because your o-line can't block. You won't score. C)If your best weapons are used to protect the QB every other 3rd down and removed from being given the ball. You are self defeating. D)In the history of the NFL. "We drafted him or gave him a big contract (running back) because he can block" has never been spoken by an HC, GM or Owner. There is I dumbed down to a kindergarten level. A) No shit.. Nothing to do with the subject we’re discussing. B) Being in 3rd and long is part of the NFL. The trick is to keep it 3rd and short. Every coach from junior high, to the pros knows this. C) Your best weapon should also be able to do the dirty work. If a running back can’t block at this level, he will become a liability. D) The history of the position, a running back never got to an all time status with a glaring weakness. You dumbed it down alright..
|
|
|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 16:43:11 GMT -5
A) If your o-line can not block you won't score. B) If you are in 3rd and long every other 3rd down because your o-line can't block. You won't score. C)If your best weapons are used to protect the QB every other 3rd down and removed from being given the ball. You are self defeating. D)In the history of the NFL. "We drafted him or gave him a big contract (running back) because he can block" has never been spoken by an HC, GM or Owner. There is I dumbed down to a kindergarten level. A) No shit.. Nothing to do with the subject we’re discussing. B) Being in 3rd and long is part of the NFL. The trick is to keep it 3rd and short. Every coach from junior high, to the pros knows this. C) Your best weapon should also be able to do the dirty work. If a running back can’t block at this level, he will become a liability. D) The history of the position, a running back never got to an all time status with a glaring weakness. You dumbed it down alright.. Krunchy who is The HC's RB blocker that you and other are are saying we need so desperately? Now Booker apparently is not that guy and Him and Barkley are shoe ins to make the team . So Kruunch I will ask you again who is our 3rd down pass blocker???????? Since you are so sure it is not Barkley and Booker is no upgrade apparently. If you are so sure Saquan is sitting on the sideline on passing downs and Booker is a turnstile. WTF didn't JJ and DG address the oh so needed pass protector RB? Because they do not see not as a problem As you and the "no Saquan on passing down" do. I know those pesky little facts always getting in the way of bias against the player.
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on May 25, 2021 17:04:47 GMT -5
A) No shit.. Nothing to do with the subject we’re discussing. B) Being in 3rd and long is part of the NFL. The trick is to keep it 3rd and short. Every coach from junior high, to the pros knows this. C) Your best weapon should also be able to do the dirty work. If a running back can’t block at this level, he will become a liability. D) The history of the position, a running back never got to an all time status with a glaring weakness. You dumbed it down alright.. Krunchy who is The HC's RB blocker that you and other are are saying we need so desperately? Now Booker apparently is not that guy and Him and Barkley are shoe ins to make the team . So Kruunch I will ask you again who is our 3rd down pass blocker???????? Since you are so sure it is not Barkley and Booker is no upgrade apparently. If you are so sure Saquan is sitting on the sideline on passing downs and Booker is a turnstile. WTF didn't JJ and DG address the oh so needed pass protector RB? Because they do not see not as a problem As you and the "no Saquan on passing down" do. I know those pesky little facts always getting in the way of bias against the player. It’s Barkley of course. Wasn’t that already established like pages ago? I even mentioned it was him, until he gets Jones killed. He has already been substituted for Gallman two years ago. If, he’s not capable of doing this pesky chore, the Giants will have someone else who can do it. Hence, why they gave Booker a 2 year deal. Opinions always find their way to being called facts. Even when it’s been proven otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 17:21:01 GMT -5
You do not leave your best horse in the stable on race day. If you want to believe it or not. He will be on the field on 3rd down Then why write all this BS Ah, yes you do when your horse doesn’t know how to run. Unless, you want to give the defense an advantage pre snap. He can’t block, so he’s going run a wheel route or button hook. He’s great out of the backfield, no question. However, when everyone in the league knows his blocking is suspect, they will blitz religiously on his side. He’ll be on 3rd downs, until he gets Jones killed. Then, it will be Booker. It’s Barkley of course. Wasn’t that already established like pages ago? I even mentioned it was him, until he gets Jones killed. He has already been substituted for Gallman two years ago. If, he’s not capable of doing this pesky chore, the Giants will have someone else who can do it. Hence, why they gave Booker a 2 year deal. Opinions always find their way to being called facts. Even when it’s been proven otherwise. Because the FO and Coaching staff do not see it as a big issue as you and others do. Or it would have been addressed. Wayne Gallman could block better than Saquan and Booker. Yet the let his A$$ walk for peanuts. Because the Coach and GM believe pass protection from a RB is very low on the skill list that is required for that position. Now if my opinion is not based on facts. You tell me why i am wrong?
|
|
|
Post by Kruunch on May 25, 2021 18:10:12 GMT -5
You do not leave your best horse in the stable on race day. If you want to believe it or not. He will be on the field on 3rd down Then why write all this BS Ah, yes you do when your horse doesn’t know how to run. Unless, you want to give the defense an advantage pre snap. He can’t block, so he’s going run a wheel route or button hook. He’s great out of the backfield, no question. However, when everyone in the league knows his blocking is suspect, they will blitz religiously on his side. He’ll be on 3rd downs, until he gets Jones killed. Then, it will be Booker. It’s Barkley of course. Wasn’t that already established like pages ago? I even mentioned it was him, until he gets Jones killed. He has already been substituted for Gallman two years ago. If, he’s not capable of doing this pesky chore, the Giants will have someone else who can do it. Hence, why they gave Booker a 2 year deal. Opinions always find their way to being called facts. Even when it’s been proven otherwise. Because the FO and Coaching staff do not see it as a big issue as you and others do. Or it would have been addressed. Wayne Gallman could block better than Saquan and Booker. Yet the let his A$$ walk for peanuts. Because the Coach and GM believe pass protection from a RB is very low on the skill list that is required for that position. Now if my opinion is not based on facts. You tell me why i am wrong? This is the same head coach and front office you’ve been bitching about for neglecting drafting a single offensive lineman in the draft. Now, they’re geniuses. That TEM, is the definition of hypocrisy.. They can’t be idiots one second, and trusted the next. It’s a classic fit your narrative argument.
|
|
|
Post by TEM on May 25, 2021 19:00:59 GMT -5
Then why write all this BS Because the FO and Coaching staff do not see it as a big issue as you and others do. Or it would have been addressed. Wayne Gallman could block better than Saquan and Booker. Yet the let his A$$ walk for peanuts. Because the Coach and GM believe pass protection from a RB is very low on the skill list that is required for that position. Now if my opinion is not based on facts. You tell me why i am wrong? This is the same head coach and front office you’ve been bitching about for neglecting drafting a single offensive lineman in the draft. Now, they’re geniuses. That TEM, is the definition of hypocrisy.. They can’t be idiots one second, and trusted the next. It’s a classic fit your narrative argument. Oh but you are wrong . Unlike the non-addressing the As you say "a pass protecting RB.' They did address the O-line. I just shown my concern in who they addressed it with. Unlikely to paraphrase what you stated .Even if he is exceptional for the next 2 seasons. You want him gone.( I can show your post) I have stated I want to be wrong about the O-line numerous times. Can you say you want to be wrong about Barkley? This the exact phrase you used. "Then we thank him for his services, as we drive him to the airport"
|
|